1500 Questions | GitHub Advanced Security 2026

Master new skills with expert-led instruction. Get 100% OFF with verified coupons and earn your certificate.

0.0
0 students
English
1500 Questions | GitHub Advanced Security 2026
FREE$34.99
100% OFF
Enroll Now β€” It's Free!

Lifetime access β€’ Certificate included

This course includes:

  • πŸ“Ή0 mins on-demand video
  • πŸ“„0 articles
  • πŸ“₯0 downloadable resources
  • πŸ“±Access on mobile and TV
  • πŸ†Certificate of completion
  • ♾️Full lifetime access
⏱️
0
Video Hours
πŸ“
0
Articles
πŸ“
0
Resources
⭐
0.0
Rating

πŸ“–About This Course

Detailed Exam Domain Coverage:Secure Development Lifecycle (18%), Topics: Code Review, Secure Coding Practices, Supply Chain SecurityVulnerability Detection (21%), Topics: Vulnerability Scanning, Exploit Prediction, Vulnerability RemediationSecurity Incident Response (25%), Topics: Threat Detection, Incident Response, Security OrchestrationSecurity and Compliance (16%), Topics: Compliance, Security Policies, GovernanceDeveloping Secure Code Solutions (20%), Topics: Secure Coding Practices, Secure APIs, Secure StorageI have carefully structured this comprehensive test bank to validate your skills in securing your software supply chain, detecting and responding to security vulnerabilities, and improving the overall security posture of your code, This curriculum contains 1500 original practice questions that I created to deeply reflect the exact domains of the official GitHub Advanced Security exam, By practicing with these scenarios, you will build genuine hands-on familiarity with vulnerability scanning, exploit prediction, and threat detection, I made sure each question provides a highly detailed explanation so you actually master the core concepts behind secure APIs and governance rather than just memorizing options,Sample Practice QuestionsQuestion 1: Secure Development Lifecycle Which of the following approaches best enforces a secure software supply chain within a GitHub repository?Options:A) Granting admin privileges to all contributors to speed up the code review processB) Disabling branch protections to allow rapid merging of security patchesC) Enabling dependency review enforcement to prevent introducing vulnerable dependenciesD) Storing hardcoded secrets in a private repository instead of a public oneE) Bypassing status checks for automated bot pull requestsF) Relying solely on manual code reviews for dependency updatesCorrect Answer: CExplanations:Option A: Incorrect, granting admin privileges violates the principle of least privilege,Option B: Incorrect, branch protections are essential for enforcing code reviews and status checks,Option C: Correct, dependency review enforcement automatically checks for vulnerabilities in pull requests before they are merged, securing the supply chain,Option D: Incorrect, storing secrets in code, even in private repositories, is a major security risk,Option E: Incorrect, bypassing checks for bots can introduce unverified malicious code into the environment,Option F: Incorrect, manual reviews alone are prone to human error and do not scale effectively for large dependency trees,Overall Explanation: Securing the supply chain requires automated tooling to detect vulnerable dependencies before they enter the main branch, Dependency review enforcement is a key GitHub Advanced Security feature that achieves this exact goal,Question 2: Vulnerability Detection When configuring GitHub CodeQL for vulnerability scanning, which action ensures that both standard vulnerabilities and highly severe exploit predictions are caught during a pull request?Options:A) Running CodeQL only on the default branch once a weekB) Configuring the CodeQL action to trigger on 'pull_request' and using the 'security-extended' query suiteC) Disabling the autobuild feature for compiled languagesD) Setting the vulnerability alert threshold to only notify for 'low' severity issuesE) Removing the dependency graph configuration from the repositoryF) Uploading a third-party SARIF file without configuring CodeQL rulesCorrect Answer: BExplanations:Option A: Incorrect, weekly scans do not prevent vulnerabilities from being introduced in active pull requests,Option B: Correct, triggering on pull requests catches issues early, and the security-extended suite includes advanced exploit prediction queries,Option C: Incorrect, autobuild or a manual build step is required for CodeQL to analyze compiled languages,Option D: Incorrect, filtering only for low severity ignores critical and high vulnerabilities,Option E: Incorrect, the dependency graph is required for Dependabot, not directly CodeQL, but removing it weakens overall detection,Option F: Incorrect, uploading SARIF files imports alerts but does not configure native CodeQL scanning mechanisms,Overall Explanation: Effective vulnerability detection requires integrating static analysis directly into the developer workflow, CodeQL configured on pull requests with extended queries ensures maximum coverage before code is merged,Question 3: Security Incident Response During a security incident involving a leaked personal access token, what is the most appropriate first step utilizing GitHub's security orchestration tools?Options:A) Delete the entire repository to contain the leakB) Ignore the alert if the repository is privateC) Revoke the exposed token immediately and review the audit log for unauthorized accessD) Wait for the weekly security report to confirm the leakE) Change the organization's billing informationF) Disable GitHub Actions globally across all repositoriesCorrect Answer: CExplanations:Option A: Incorrect, deleting the repository causes data loss and disrupts operations unnecessarily,Option B: Incorrect, private repositories can still be compromised if a token is leaked,Option C: Correct, revoking the token neutralizes the immediate threat, and reviewing the audit log is crucial for incident response and scoping,Option D: Incorrect, incident response requires immediate action, not waiting for scheduled reports,Option E: Incorrect, billing info is irrelevant to a leaked access token incident,Option F: Incorrect, disabling Actions globally is an overreaction that disrupts CI/CD pipelines without addressing the token,Overall Explanation: Incident response relies on swift containment and investigation, Secret scanning alerts require immediate token revocation, followed by a thorough investigation using audit logs to determine the extent of the breach,Course FeaturesWelcome to the Mock Exam Practice Tests Academy to help you prepare for your GitHub Advanced Security CertificationYou can retake the exams as many times as you wantThis is a huge original question bankYou get support from instructors if you have questionsEach question has a detailed explanationMobile-compatible with the Udemy appI hope that by now you're convinced, And there are a lot more questions inside the course,

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Is this course really free?

Yes! Using our verified coupon code, you can enroll for 100% OFF. No hidden charges.

Q: Do I get a certificate?

Upon completion of all video lectures, Udemy will issue a certificate of completion.

Q: How long is my access?

Once you enroll with the coupon, you get full lifetime access to the materials.

You May Also Like

1500 Questions | HashiCorp Certified Consul Associate (003)
Free
Click to View Details

1500 Questions | HashiCorp Certified Consul Associate (003)

0.0
β€’0 students
FREE$34.99
Salesforce marketing cloud consultant exam prep
Free
Click to View Details

Salesforce marketing cloud consultant exam prep

0.0
β€’12 students
FREE$19.99
AI Security Manager Exam Prep: 100+ Practice Questions
Free
Click to View Details

AI Security Manager Exam Prep: 100+ Practice Questions

4.5
β€’10 students
FREE$34.99